Raam op Rusland
  • Home
  • Dossiers
    • Kremlin
    • Binnenlandse politiek
    • Buitenlandse politiek
    • Oekraïne
    • Stemmen uit de oorlog
    • Nederland en Europa
    • Economie
    • Defensie
    • Rechtsstaat en civil society
    • Media
    • Religie
    • Cultuur
    • Geschiedschrijving
    • Sport
    • Belarus
    • : : Overzicht alle dossiers
    • Kaukasus
    • Centraal Azië
  • Debat
    • New restraint in Russia's foreign policy?
    • Western policies are influenced by Russophobia
    • Who is to blame?
    • Hoe Stalin te overwinnen
    • Europa tussen hamer en aambeeld?
    • Geschiedschrijving als politiek instrument
    • Het einde van de Pax Americana
    • Het ethische vacuüm in Rusland
    • Wat is het antwoord van Europa?
    • : : Overzicht alle debatten
  • Actueel
  • Auteurs
  • Onderzoek
    • Civil Society & Corona
    • Scripties
  • Over ons
    • Agenda
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Partner
    • Missie & activiteiten
    • Organisatie
    • Privacy
    • Doneren
  • [ EN ]
  • [ PYC ]

Podium voor kennis, analyse en debat. Partner van Universiteit Leiden en Instituut Clingendael

Podium voor kennis, analyse en debat. Partner van Universiteit Leiden en Instituut Clingendael

  • Belarus as 'the next Crimea'? Highly unlikely

    After the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 many feared that this 'compatriot protection scheme' could become a precedent. The author concludes that conditions in Belarus are ultimately unfavorable to Russian-sponsored secessionism. The national uprising after the election fraud of August 2020 proved to be a gamechanger as well.
    by Tijs van de Vijver
  • The delicate balance of Great Patriotic War history politics

    Instead of playing the blame game on the eve of the 75th celebration of the victory over Nazi Germany, Western leaders should understand the feelings of the Russians. And attend on May 9 the parade in Moscow, argues our columnist Mark Galeotti.
    by Mark Galeotti
  • Russia and NATO both think time is on their side

    According to Russia all military and political cooperation with NATO has effectively ended. There is no readiness for compromise or pragmatism, as both sides appear to think time is on their side. That's the real tragedy, writes our columnist Mark Galeotti.
    by Mark Galeotti
  • Special troops of GRU will be growing headache for the West

    Ruslan Boshirov, one of the suspects of the poison attack on Skripal, has been identified by research group Bellingcat as a

    ...
  • Europe's challenge: a measured response to Russia

    With the end of the Cold War the geo-strategic reality in Europe changed. The Charter of Paris, signed in 1990, confirmed the right

    ...
  • U.S-Russian Relations: Back to Square One - Part II

    After Donald Trump took power a ‘reset’ of U.S.-Russian relations wasn’t even attempted. Why was a ‘grand bargain’, being so far

    ...
  • The Baltics in weak Europe: be tough and don't panic

    Since the Russian interference in Ukraine the three Baltic countries started worrying about their security situation. They

    ...
  • Европа — назад к сферам влияния?

    Владимир Путин требует для России положения сверхдержавы, и избрание Трампа может сыграть ему на руку. Но на чем основаны

    ...
  • What is behind Russia's tough talk on Crimea?

    Russia reacted unusually strong after a misty shoot-out near the border with Crimea, blamed on 'Ukrainian terrorists'. Putin in

    ...

naar boven

© 2022 Raam op Rusland

Contact